Stacks AI Studio Let's Talk

Stacks AI Studio / Commercial Construction Subcontractors

AI for Commercial Construction Subcontractors

"I feel behind on AI, and there is no chance I can catch up." If that is the sentence in your head, you are exactly who I work with. I am not selling software or theory-based advice. I run my own ten person managed services business on Claude, I know the value it adds every week, and now I help owners do the same inside commercial construction subcontractors like yours: your team trained, jobs automated, hours saved. Saying yes to starting puts you ahead of many of your competitors.

Book A 15 Minute Call See five automations we could build
Line drawing of an I-beam on a crane hook
5.5 hours hours back per person, weekly

Experience, Not Theory

That is our first four automations at Stacks, across a ten person team. We took on more clients, and gross margin went from 26% to 56% in twelve months. AI was not the only driver. It was the biggest one. It also set a new standard for what my team sends out: the same bar for research, formatting, and finish on everything that leaves the building, no shortcuts.

Casey Templeton, Founder of Stacks. Nashville.

"In one week I went from a two-hour session with Casey to a brand new marketing site and firing the marketing firm I'd used for two years. If Casey wants to work with you, don't be a dummy. Just do it."
Mike Kelly, CEO, TeamOnUP

The Week

Your Week. I Know It.

Five jobs that eat the week. This is the work an automation goes after first.

An ITB lands with the bid due Friday. The scope gaps turn up after the number goes in.

The field hits a conflict in the drawings. The RFI gets written at nine at night.

Submittals are due before the first delivery. Product data is spread across six emails and a folder.

Extra work goes in on a verbal. The T and M tags sit in a truck all week.

Pay apps are due the twenty fifth. Somebody rebuilds the G703 and chases lien waivers.

44 percent of firms name competition for projects a top concern.

More companies chasing the same jobs means every bid has to say exactly what you carry.

Source: AGC of America and Sage, January 2026.

The First Step

Two Sessions. Two Hours Each.

For most commercial construction subcontractors, this is the first step. Homework first, then two sessions, two hours each. In person if you are near Nashville, or over Zoom. $1,950.

For the math: one person at $25 an hour who gets two hours a week back is worth about $2,600 a year. If the first automation does that for one employee, it pays for itself with room to spare. And if after our first session you do not see a job worth automating, you pay nothing.

An automation is a repeated piece of work you teach Claude once. Your team runs it every day, you own it and tune it, and it carries the work to 80 percent so your people finish the 20 that needs their judgment.

Book A 15 Minute Call

"Casey taught me how to actually put AI to work. I generate quotes faster, my workflow is smoother, and I'm making more money because of it. One of the best investments I've made in my business."
David Pledge, Construction Sales Lead

01

Homework

Before we ever meet, you pull real examples of the work that eats your week: actual documents, actual messages, nothing cleaned up for me.

02

Session One

Two hours. We map how your company actually runs, get Claude set up for your team, and train you on how to operate it.

03

Session Two

Two hours. We start building your first automations and put together the training your team needs to run Claude every day.

04

What You Leave With

Claude running for your team, your people trained on it, and one job automated and in use.

Five Automations We Could Build In Your Company.

One page, no obligation. Proof of what we could build together, before we ever talk.

One email with the PDF. No newsletter, no drip campaign.

45 percent

of firms started or expanded AI in office work.

Source: AGC of America and Sage, January 2026.

Certified payroll on public work carries a signed statement of compliance, so a person reviews every billing package before it reaches the GC.

The Stack

Claude Sits In The Middle.

It works with the tools you already run. It reads from your project management system, your estimating files, and your accounting, and writes back where it can.

Start with one connection, not all of them. The first automation usually needs one export from your project management system, and that is the whole first step. Once it earns its keep, the next system comes in, then the one after that. Every automation gets sharper as it goes, because Claude can finally see across the whole job instead of one screen at a time.

Claude Project management Estimating Plans and specs Accounting Field reporting

The Numbers

The Numbers Contractors Are Seeing.

That feeling of being behind is not in your head. Adoption among commercial construction subcontractors jumped in a single year, and hiring is still the hard part.

61 percent

Using AI or investing more

Source: AGC of America and Sage, January 2026.

80 percent

Hard time filling open positions

Source: AGC of America and Sage, January 2026.

Questions

Questions, Answered.

I feel like I am already behind on AI. Is it too late?

No, and you are not as far behind as you think. The owners who feel furthest behind often move fastest once they start, because they have not spent a year on tools that did not stick. You do not need a strategy, a budget cycle, or a technical person on staff. You need four hours and one job that is costing you time every week. That is the whole first step.

Will this replace my staff?

No, and that is the whole design. An automation carries a job to 80 percent quickly and your PM takes the final 20 percent over the finish line. Efficiency goes up for everyone, the company grows without the headcount it used to need, margins grow with it, and your people spend their time on scope and schedule instead of retyping.

Will it work with the software we already run?

Usually, whether that is Procore, Autodesk Build, eSUB, Bluebeam, or Foundation. Whatever system the GC picked counts too. Some give me an API, some a nightly export, and a few nothing but a screen to copy from. I tell you which one you have before I scope anything.

Does any of this do our takeoff?

No. Everything I build is admin. An automation reads a spec section and flags what the drawings leave out, but it never sets a quantity you bid. There are AI products built to do takeoff, and that is a different job from mine. Your estimator owns the numbers.

What about means and methods and safety?

Those stay with your people, every time. No automation signs off on means and methods, a safety plan, an inspection, or anything a code official has to accept. It drafts the paperwork that follows a call your superintendent already made. That call is not mine, and the review step is written into every automation.

What happens to our drawings and contracts?

You approve the data path before any automation runs. Plans, specs, and subcontracts often carry confidentiality terms from the owner or the GC. So the data path is written down, you approve it before an automation runs on anything real, and the automations and documentation stay in your account.

How long before we see something working?

The first automation runs in weeks, not quarters. The two sessions scope it, I build it against your real bid packages and RFI log, and your team uses it while I refine it. One automation in production beats five in a plan.

My estimators are not computer people. Is that a problem?

It is the case I build for. An automation is run by typing a request in plain English, the way you would brief a new PM. The hard part is written down once, by me, with your team in the room. Nobody has to learn software to use one.

What if we get to the end and nothing is worth automating?

Then you pay nothing. If after our first session you do not see a job worth automating, the engagement ends there and there is no charge. The first session either surfaces a job worth the money or it does not, and that risk is mine, not yours.

Why $1,950?

Because the format is small on purpose. Homework, two working sessions of two hours each, and the setup work around them. For the math: one person at $25 an hour who gets two hours a week back is worth about $2,600 a year. If the first automation does that for one employee, it has paid for itself with room to spare. Every number in that sentence is yours to check.

Casey Templeton, founder of Stacks

Who You Will Be Working With

Casey Templeton.

Founder of Stacks, a ten person business in Nashville that runs on Claude. Both sessions are with him directly, and every message from this page lands in his inbox, not a queue.

Start Here

Start With A Conversation Between Two Small Business Owners.

Tell me about your company. I take on two or three of these engagements a month. Every message comes to me and I answer it myself. The first conversation costs nothing.

Book A 15 Minute Call
"A fear of not understanding AI had kept me from diving in. Casey's coaching changed that. It opened my eyes to a sea of possibilities and left me more confident to explore. Come open-minded, and see where your imagination takes you."
John Conger, Sports Coaching Professional

I reply to every message. No newsletter, no drip campaign.

I reply to every message. No newsletter, no drip campaign.